The Bitcoin Credit Stack
rates are percent a year, continuously compounded · figures as of 2026-10-15 · read 2026-10-16 04:01 UTC
Market › Posted card › Hodlnaut

Hodlnaut

Takes as collateral: bitcoin

cefi_hodlnaut · lending desk · operated by Hodlnaut Pte. Ltd. · defunct

Events for this venue: dated moves past a published rule and levels crossed.

BTC collateral
not applicable
Dollar debt against bitcoin
not applicable
Aggregate LTV
not applicable
Borrow rate (USD loans)
not applicable
Lend rate (USD loans)
not applicable
Liquidates at
not applicable
Dollar loans only: other currencies are separate books, never added in

Debt and rates count loans made in US dollars and dollar stablecoins. Loans in euros, francs, yen, ether or bitcoin itself are separate books, shown by currency on each venue, never added in.

BTC collateral of Posted card
Dollar debt against bitcoin of the market — Posted card 7.3%, 5.0% of its bitcoin collateral

10 of 10 criteria researched. What the criteria are →

Markets — as served, not a venue rate

One row per market, as the venue publishes them. These are market rates: combining them into a single venue rate is a weighting across this venue's markets, and choosing one here would be a methodology decision taken in a web page.

No BTC market rows are served for this venue. This venue runs no contracts, so there is no market state to read — the absence is a property of the venue class, not a gap.

Price

What does credit cost here, and how is the price formed?

Rate formationposted_card
source
As the desk operated before it failed (2022-06-01). not_applicable. No user loan product; institutional loans were arranged by contacting the desk, so bilateral and unpublished. Evidence: "For more information, you can connect with us at support@hodlnaut.com" — Hodlnaut landing page /hnap0001 with 'Institutional Loans' section (desk's own site, still served; page undated, footer states MAS in-principle approval so it dates from 2022), 2022 (https://www.hodlnaut.com/hnap0001).
Term structurenot_applicable
source
As the desk operated before it failed (2022-06-01). No user loan product. Institutional loans were offered on 'open terms or 3+ months fixed terms' per the desk page. Evidence: "Choose between open terms or 3+ months fixed terms" — Hodlnaut landing page /hnap0001 with 'Institutional Loans' section (desk's own site, still served; page undated, footer states MAS in-principle approval so it dates from 2022), 2022 (https://www.hodlnaut.com/hnap0001).
Rate certaintynot_applicable
source
As the desk operated before it failed (2022-06-01). No user loan product. No borrowing rate was published for institutional loans ('One of the lowest rates in the market' is the only statement). Evidence: "One of the lowest rates in the market" — Hodlnaut landing page /hnap0001 with 'Institutional Loans' section (desk's own site, still served; page undated, footer states MAS in-principle approval so it dates from 2022), 2022 (https://www.hodlnaut.com/hnap0001).

Quality

What stands behind a position, and what can change under the reader?

Oracle dependencynot_applicable
source
As the desk operated before it failed (2022-06-01). No bitcoin-backed loan product for users; nothing on price sources for the institutional loans was published. Evidence: "Its main business is the provision of a cryptocurrency trading platform, which allows its users to deposit digital assets to earn interest." — Loh Cheng Lee Aaron and another v Hodlnaut Pte Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) [2024] SGHC 257, 2024-10-11 (https://www.elitigation.sg/gd/s/2024_SGHC_257); 1 further quote(s) in registry/resolution/2026-09/defunct_desks_other.json.
Default & liquidationnot_applicable
source
As the desk operated before it failed (2022-06-01). No user loan product. For institutional loans the desk page gives only an origination range ('loan to value ratio from 25% to 70%'); no margin-call or liquidation level is published. Evidence: "Flexible loan to value ratio from 25% to 70%" — Hodlnaut landing page /hnap0001 with 'Institutional Loans' section (desk's own site, still served; page undated, footer states MAS in-principle approval so it dates from 2022), 2022 (https://www.hodlnaut.com/hnap0001).
Custody & backingnot_applicable
source
As the desk operated before it failed (2022-06-01). No loan collateral terms exist to classify. What the terms do establish is the treatment of DEPOSITS: users granted the Hodlnaut Group the right to hold them in its own name and to pledge, rehypothecate, sell, lend or otherwise use them 'with all attendant rights of ownership', without keeping a like amount on hand. The court later recorded commingling of digital assets across the group. Evidence: "to pledge, repledge, hypothecate, rehypothecate, sell, lend, or otherwise transfer or use any amount of such Digital Assets, separately or together with other property, with all attendant rights of ownership" — Hodlnaut Standard Terms and Conditions (Terms of Use), 'Updated as at June 1, 2022' (desk's own site, still served; web.archive.org holds no snapshots of hodlnaut.com), 2022-06-01 (https://www.hodlnaut.com/tos); 2 further quote(s) in registry/resolution/2026-09/defunct_desks_other.json.
Recoursenot_applicable
source
As the desk operated before it failed (2022-06-01). No user loan product; no recourse terms for institutional loans were published. Evidence: "Its main business is the provision of a cryptocurrency trading platform, which allows its users to deposit digital assets to earn interest." — Loh Cheng Lee Aaron and another v Hodlnaut Pte Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) [2024] SGHC 257, 2024-10-11 (https://www.elitigation.sg/gd/s/2024_SGHC_257); 1 further quote(s) in registry/resolution/2026-09/defunct_desks_other.json.
Track recordunknown (this dataset postdates the venue. The venue is defunct and carries a terminal_date but no first_date, because it was never observed while trading. A span inferred from the terminal date would be a guess, and would understate exactly the history this dataset exists to measure.)

Composition

Who and what makes up this market?

Collateral acceptednot_applicable
source
As the desk operated before it failed (2022-06-01). BTC was accepted as a DEPOSIT asset, not shown as loan collateral: the institutional-loan page does not name the collateral. In the insolvency users are unsecured creditors: their crypto claims count as debts of the company, and the liquidators state assets are distributed pari passu to unsecured creditors after secured and priority debts. Evidence: "We are currently accepting deposits in BTC, ETH, WBTC, USDC, USDT, DAI and PAXG." — Hodlnaut home page (desk's own site, frozen with withdrawal-halt banner), 2022-08 (https://www.hodlnaut.com/); 2 further quote(s) in registry/resolution/2026-09/defunct_desks_other.json. Loan book at failure: Not found. The interim judicial managers' reports and the winding-up affidavits on the EY page are password-protected PDFs and could not be read; the published judgments give no loan or collateral figures. The only figure recovered is the press-reported loss of US$189.7m on TerraUSD attributed to the directors of Hodlnaut's Hong Kong subsidiary (secondary). What failed: Hodlnaut halted withdrawals, token swaps and deposits on 8 August 2022 and ceased its borrowing and lending services; according to press reports of the interim judicial managers' first report it had converted a significant amount of user crypto into TerraUSD staked on Anchor and lost about US$189.7m when Terra collapsed (secondary source). The court placed it under interim judicial management on 29 August 2022 because its assets were in jeopardy, and wound it up on 10 November 2023 as cash-flow insolvent.
Book depth & concentrationunknown (no per-venue counterparty count exists in this registry or in the comparison payload, so depth and concentration cannot be established. This is a gap in THIS DATASET, not in the venue, and is a different value from `undisclosed`, which would mean the venue does not publish it.)
Observability
price: partial — Posted rates recoverable from Internet Archive snapshots as archived_card. NOT YET INGESTED.
quantity: partial — Singapore insolvency record only — the office-holder's circulars to creditors, as dated snapshots rather than a series. Absent from US federal dockets entirely. NOT YET INGESTED.
composition: none — Loan-level composition unobtainable for a wound-up custodial desk.

What the loans are denominated in

Not disclosed"Institutional Loan Features Minimum loan amount: USD 50,000 Flexible loan to value ratio from 25% to 70%" — https://www.hodlnaut.com/hnap0001, read 2026-10-05

Each currency is a separate book; the dollar equivalents compare sizes and are never added together.

Backing chain

not applicable — no loan exists, so no collateral stands between a creditor and coins
source
attribute · collateral_asset = not_applicable
As the desk operated before it failed (2022-06-01). BTC was accepted as a DEPOSIT asset, not shown as loan collateral: the institutional-loan page does not name the collateral. In the insolvency users are unsecured creditors: their crypto claims count as debts of the company, and the liquidators state assets are distributed pari passu to unsecured creditors after secured and priority debts. Evidence: "We are currently accepting deposits in BTC, ETH, WBTC, USDC, USDT, DAI and PAXG." — Hodlnaut home page (desk's own site, frozen with withdrawal-halt banner), 2022-08 (https://www.hodlnaut.com/); 2 further quote(s) in registry/resolution/2026-09/defunct_desks_other.json. Loan book at failure: Not found. The interim judicial managers' reports and the winding-up affidavits on the EY page are password-protected PDFs and could not be read; the published judgments give no loan or collateral figures. The only figure recovered is the press-reported loss of US$189.7m on TerraUSD attributed to the directors of Hodlnaut's Hong Kong subsidiary (secondary). What failed: Hodlnaut halted withdrawals, token swaps and deposits on 8 August 2022 and ceased its borrowing and lending services; according to press reports of the interim judicial managers' first report it had converted a significant amount of user crypto into TerraUSD staked on Anchor and lost about US$189.7m when Terra collapsed (secondary source). The court placed it under interim judicial management on 29 August 2022 because its assets were in jeopardy, and wound it up on 10 November 2023 as cash-flow insolvent.

The generic axis set

Identical for every venue, identically computed. An axis that cannot be computed here renders its reason — never silently omitted, because an omitted axis says it was not considered. A figure that covers only part of what the axis asks is marked, with what it leaves out beneath it. Collateral, debt and the borrow and lend rates are the tiles at the top of this page.

Utilisation (venue roll-up)not applicable — there is no pool of deposits here to be drawn
Intermediation marginnot applicable — needs both a borrow and a lend rate; the borrow rate is not served here
Trailing realised average (7/30/90d)unknown (not published by the venue) — a posted or filed rate has no daily series here
Rate volatility (30/90d)unknown (not published by the venue) — a posted or filed rate has no daily series here
Spread to the pair aggregatenot applicable — this venue has no borrow rate to compare
Spread to matched Treasuriesnot applicable — this venue has no borrow rate to compare
Origination flowunknown (not published by the venue) — the venue publishes no loan-by-loan flow
Repayment flowunknown (not published by the venue) — the venue publishes no loan-by-loan flow
Aggregate and distributional LTVnot applicable — the venue is defunct: it no longer lends, and this tile describes a live book
Residence distributionunknown (not published by the venue) — the venue publishes no loan durations
Liquidation incidenceunknown (not published by the venue) — the venue publishes no liquidations
Top-10 concentration shareunknown (not published by the venue) — the venue publishes no borrower distribution

Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (H.15, H.4.1, H.6).

There is no score on this page and none will be added. The criteria are published and versioned before any venue is measured against them, and this venue's row is produced by the same pipeline as every other.

Access routes

Unknown (not surveyed yet). No one has looked for an MCP server for this venue. That is not the same as having looked and found none, and this row will not say the second while meaning the first. The listing criteria are published.

Ask for this by machine

REST
GET https://api.bitcoincreditstack.com/v1/market/venues/cefi_hodlnaut
MCP
get_venue({ venue_id: "cefi_hodlnaut" })
get_venue({ venue_id: "cefi_hodlnaut", include: ["axes", "headline"] })

The same figures, the same names and dates. Connect your AI →

Ask your own question about this venue
read-only MCP · zero write tools · no account

How this venue compares depends on what you'd borrow, for how long, against what. That's a question for your AI, with this data behind it.

Orientation · HodlnautHolder · HodlnautTreasurer · HodlnautAnalyst · HodlnautRisk · Hodlnaut
Add to Claude ↗Connect in Cursor ↗Connect in VS Code ↗Add to ChatGPT ↗Add to Grok ↗or copy the MCP URLhttps://mcp.bitcoincreditstack.com/mcp